Let me help- |
Across the top is an option to choose between austenitic (the 18/8 series
such as 304 or 316) or duplex stainless steel, or mild steel. Leave that
for now, the formulae will default to austenitic stainless.
|
Enter- |
5 in Material
cost, 15 in Margin and 50 in Labour rate. You have
set the defaults for the "worksheet" |
|
a. in
Component, 10 for Thick(ness), 500 for Width, 1000 for
Length, 1 as the Number (off)
The weight and price of the material has been calculated,
both for this component and the whole worksheet. Ignore the Override $/kg at this stage but see Note1 below*. |
Complexity- |
For this
exercise, enter 1 for a simple mark and cut process. (Note but ignore
the override hrs just now)
This is a smart
bit. A trifle complex like its name, but when mastered it will bring some of the power of
computing to your quoting. The effect on suggested man hours depends
somewhat on the "density" of the work pieces but as a starting
point, for thicknesses between say 2.0mm and 25.0mm, a factor of 1
approximates to a basic, rectangular, mark and cut process. 10 is a
complex shaped component requiring deforming, welding and reforming, a
dome end for example. Therefore, halfway between, 5 is an average overall
for say a tank, that includes the simple coil-based barrel and the more
complex cone or dome ends.
Note
that suggested hours
have been calculated and added
to the component price and the whole sheet, and that a job
start-up time has been included in the total hours. This will be added to,
as more components are defined, consequently the hours increase. The
increase however, is less significant, once the job has been
initiated...as you might expect. Note the increase when the second
component has been defined.
|
Next
line enter- |
b.
as the Component, 1.6 for Thickness, 500 for width, 6250 for Length, 1 the
Number and 1 for Complexity.
Have you noticed anything unexpected?
The material is the same at 40kgs and it is the same mark and cut process,
yet the hours are double at 1.5
At 6¼ meters long, versus just 1 meter, this second component is a more
difficult work-piece to handle. It will definitely need two men to
manipulate and handle for a start.
This feature however, generates possibly exaggerated results when
extended into an unusual range. For instance, if the thickness is 1.0mm
and the length 10000mm the hours jump to 5¾. Some have argued that not
to be unreasonable, because it would be a very difficult piece to handle without
damaging. True, but a workshop that took on such work might be expected to
have special equipment. It is just a quirk that formula create and Quote-Genii© users need
to be aware of, if using it to venture a little outside the norm. And show me an estimator that wont override the
suggested hours anyhow! Good estimators are made that way.
At least you
will now have a consistent basis upon which to remain master of your own
destiny. J
|
Note1- |
The Number column is also used for length units such as 10 meters, feet or
whatever. This is for materials like pipe etc so that if either the
Thickness, Width or Length columns are left blank, the formula will use the
quantity in the Number column and extend it at the $/unit rate in the
next column if the $/unit rate has been entered. The other use of the $/kg or $/unit column is to override the default
material cost when all the dimensions are entered, to accommodate components
of different materials to the main bulk of the
job.
This may all sound confusing at first but it soon becomes clear with use.
The main point is, if that column contains anything, the component on
that line will be extended at that rate.
Other things worth noting are the reported mix of labour and materials in
the price, as well as the works profit per man hour. Useful information if
asked to trim your price to match someone who is still just using a dart
board as a calculator.
Finally, for this exercise, take a note of the suggested hours for either
component and change the Number off to 5 and then 10. They are not simple linear multiples, and neither would they be. Many years ago, a
senior engineer in the firm, told me that the reason the very desirable
(then) model Jaguar motor car was named Mark7 was because that was the
number at which fabrication efficiency peaked.
I could never
get that confirmed by the way. If you know whether it's true or not, would you
email
me please.
Not shown on this demonstrator is a background monitor that flashes a
warning if the hours fall outside a set of expected parameters...if you
didn't notice a dart completely missing the dartboard. You can of course
ignore it...there may be good reason.
Feel free to email me for any
further information. The address is also on the Home
Page.
To return to Quote-Genii
|